On Monday, certainly to much pomp and fanfare, FIBA officials will announce the four “wild card” entries that will round out the 2010 World Championship field of 24. The world may indeed be watching, with basketball fans in up to 15 nations truly believing their national team will be named, but is this a serious case of overhyped ado about nothing or could we be surprised?
Aside from some actual on-court results, i.e. the given team must have played in its continental qualifying tournament (so so long Italy), FIBA officials congregating to hash this selection out will consider other aspects of the country’s national program. These include certain sporting aspects, economic aspects (read: marketing potential), and governance aspects. The detailed list may be seen here, but, again, think marketability.
The list of contenders is fairly-well agreed upon and should be mostly reflected by the FIBA rankings themselves.
(As an aside, please note that Ball in Europe in no way endorses the frankly often bizarre FIBA rankings. Seriously, Argentina above Spain *and* Team USA? Russia at no. 17, five spots below Angola? We could go on and on … in any case, we’ll work under the assumption that FIBA takes its own rankings into consideration in situations such as determining wild cards for international tournaments.)
Continue Reading…