• Home
  • FIBA
  • EuroLeague
  • NBA/NCAA
  • National Leagues
  • Podcast
  • Features
  • More
  • Contact

Grimag

  • FIBA
  • EuroLeague
  • NBA/NCAA
  • National Leagues
  • Podcast
  • Features
  • More

The rules are changing

April 26, 2008

So this night, FIBA has approved some rules changes of which we have already mentioned some a few days ago. Here is complete overview of all the changes that will come into effect in the next years.

All below-mentioned rules will come into effect as of 1st October 2008, i.e. after the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games.

Art. 4.3 Uniforms
The provision that T-shirts may be worn by players under their game uniforms is not valid anymore.

Good decision, was a stupid rule in my opinion. Well, apparently, this means that it is now officially forbidden that T-shirts may be worn. I misunderstood the rule as I thought the T-shirts were already prohibited this season.

Art. 25.2.3 Player falling on the floor
It is legal when a player falls and slides on the floor while holding the ball.

Finally a clear decision in this area. The divers will get the ball and not see themselves robbed by the referee who calls a traveling.


Art. 28.1.3 Ball goes into team’s frontcourt

The ball goes to the teams’ frontcourt when, during the dribble from backcourt to frontcourt, both feet of the dribbler and the ball are in contact with the frontcourt.

Also here we have a clarification now. Good decision in my opinion.

Art. 30.1.2 Ball returned to the backcourt
It will not be a violation anymore if a player, who jumps from his frontcourt, establishes a new team control while still airborne and then lands in his team’s backcourt.

Also a good decision at first look.

Art. 31 Goaltending and interference
If a player reaches through the basket from below and touches the ball, it is an interference (and not a simple violation) with all the relevant rule consequences.

Can somebody explain me what’s the difference here?

Art. 36.1.4 Unsportsmanlike foul
If a defensive player causes contact with an opponent from behind or laterally in an attempt to stop a fast break and there is no opponent between the offensive player and the opponents’ basket, then the contact shall be judged to be unsportsmanlike.

That’s a difficult choice in my opinion. If the rule is applied in a consequent form all the time, this can be good. But still, in a fastbreak, if a player steals the ball and there is a clear 3 on 1 situation for example and the defender makes a hard foul at the three-point line; will it be a unsportsmanlike foul or not? Has to be clarified even more in my opinion.

Art. 38.3.1 Technical foul
A technical foul can be called on a player for excessive swinging of elbows (without contact).

Good choice but this remains highly arbitrary as decision and will probably be called a lot in the beginning and then anymore.

The below mentioned rule amendments will come into effect as follows:

  • For high level competitions/Level 1 (main FIBA official competitions: i.e. Olympic Tournaments, World Championships for Men and Women, U19 and U17 World Championships for Men and Women and Zone/Continental Championships for Men and Women): as of 1st October 2010, i.e. after the 2010 FIBA World Championship.
  • For medium level competitions/Level 2 (i.e. all other FIBA official competitions and the high level competitions of the national federations): as of 1st October 2012, i.e. after the London 2012 Olympic Games.

Art. 2.2.3 Free-throw lines and restricted areas
The restricted areas shall be the floor rectangle areas marked on the playing court.
The restricted (three-second) area shall be a rectangle (not anymore a trapezoid).

The new zone area will be a trapezoid. So this means less parking area violations as the big guys can put up their tent now even closer to the basket. I still don’t get it what this will help.

Art. 2.2.4 Three-point field goal area
The distance of the three-point line shall be 6,75 m (and not 6,25 m as present).

This is ok for me if the NBA does the same.

Art. 2.2.6 Throw-in side lines
The two (2) small lines shall be marked outside the court, on the opposite side of the scorer’s table and the team bench areas, with the outer edge at the distance of 8,325 m from the inside edge of the end lines; in other words, level to the top of the three-point line.
During the last two (2) minutes of the game and of the extra period, following the time-out granted to the team that has been entitled to the possession of the ball from its backcourt, the subsequent throw-in will be taken on the opposite side of the scorer’s table from the “throw-in side line” and not as presently from the centre line extended.

Interesting but not a big changer in my opinion.

Art. 2.2.7 No-charge semicircles
The no-charge semicircles shall be marked on the playing court, under the baskets. The distance of the inner edge of the semicircles shall be 1,25 m from the centre of the basket (on the floor).
A charging (offensive) foul should never be called if the contact by the offensive player is with the defensive player standing within the no-charge semicircle.

This is one of the rules I don’t like. I agree that basketball should be spectacular and that In-your-face dunks are spectacular. But I also like the crazy dude who takes a charge in this area. This will not work anymore then. Unfortunately.

Art. 29 Twenty-four seconds
If the throw-in is to be administered in the backcourt, if required by the respective rules, the 24 second device shall be reset to 24 seconds.
If the throw-in is to be administered in the frontcourt, if required by the respective rules, the 24-second device shall be reset as follows:
– If 14 seconds or more are displayed on the 24-second device at the time the game was stopped, the 24-second device shall not be reset and shall remain the same.
– If 13 seconds or less are displayed on the 24-second device at the time the game was stopped, the 24-second device shall be reset to 14 seconds.

What is this? You get new 24 (I mean 14) seconds when the ball goes out of bounds with less than 13 seconds on the shot clock? That is a strange rule because it penalizes the defense and gives a second chance to the offense. So if you see the clock running down, it is better to throw the ball on somebody’s leg that it goes out because you get back the 14 seconds? Strange rule. The same counts for press defenses.

These rules count also for women basketball.

Apr 26, 2008ballineurope
Powered by Sidelines
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
This post was published on April 26, 2008
Euroleague 1on1 tournament winner: Ramunas Sikauskas2009: Finally the true world club champion will be crowned
Comments: 7
  1. Tobias
    17 years ago

    My first thought was if they also bring in a new womens ball that they actually can make threes from that far – but yeah … 😉

    ReplyCancel
  2. Kerem Oktemus
    17 years ago

    Sounds like Europe becoming more like the NBA, going through an identity change this summer..

    ReplyCancel
  3. Kris
    17 years ago

    Why does the world adjust to the American rules (regarding the 3p-Line) when its crystalclear that Euro-ball and of course of the other continents is now more attractive and is steadily becoming more interesting then the American game ? I dont see the good things about it….maybe I am pessimistic…

    ReplyCancel
  4. Yarone Arbel
    17 years ago

    “Art. 36.1.4 Unsportsmanlike foul
    If a defensive player causes contact with an opponent from behind or laterally in an attempt to stop a fast break and there is no opponent between the offensive player and the opponents’ basket, then the contact shall be judged to be unsportsmanlike.

    That’s a difficult choice in my opinion. If the rule is applied in a consequent form all the time, this can be good. But still, in a fastbreak, if a player steals the ball and there is a clear 3 on 1 situation for example and the defender makes a hard foul at the three-point line; will it be a unsportsmanlike foul or not? Has to be clarified even more in my opinion.”

    If it’s 3 on 1 then the 1 is in front of the ball. This rule stands only if the foul comes from behind or lateral to the ball. In this case it doesn’t count as a 3 on 1… so for me it’s crystal clear.

    “Art. 29 Twenty-four seconds
    If the throw-in is to be administered in the backcourt, if required by the respective rules, the 24 second device shall be reset to 24 seconds.
    If the throw-in is to be administered in the frontcourt, if required by the respective rules, the 24-second device shall be reset as follows:
    – If 14 seconds or more are displayed on the 24-second device at the time the game was stopped, the 24-second device shall not be reset and shall remain the same.
    – If 13 seconds or less are displayed on the 24-second device at the time the game was stopped, the 24-second device shall be reset to 14 seconds.

    What is this? You get new 24 (I mean 14) seconds when the ball goes out of bounds with less than 13 seconds on the shot clock? That is a strange rule because it penalizes the defense and gives a second chance to the offense. So if you see the clock running down, it is better to throw the ball on somebody’s leg that it goes out because you get back the 14 seconds? Strange rule. The same counts for press defenses.”

    If I understood this correctly, that’s only in the case of a violation of the defense. I mean if there are 5 seconds on the shot clock and then defense foul or stop the ball with the leg, then the play will start with an in bound and 14 sec on the shot clock, not 24. It takes 10 seconds off the offense of what they get now, so it benefits the defense actually.

    “Art. 2.2.4 Three-point field goal area
    The distance of the three-point line shall be 6,75 m (and not 6,25 m as present).

    This is ok for me if the NBA does the same.”

    I don’t see what the NBA got to do with it. If you think the 3pt line is too close and 3 pt shots are made “too easily” nowadays, u should agree. if you don’t – then don’t. NBA? let them shoot from 8 meters as far as I care.

    “Art. 2.2.6 Throw-in side lines
    The two (2) small lines shall be marked outside the court, on the opposite side of the scorer’s table and the team bench areas, with the outer edge at the distance of 8,325 m from the inside edge of the end lines; in other words, level to the top of the three-point line.
    During the last two (2) minutes of the game and of the extra period, following the time-out granted to the team that has been entitled to the possession of the ball from its backcourt, the subsequent throw-in will be taken on the opposite side of the scorer’s table from the “throw-in side line” and not as presently from the centre line extended.

    Interesting but not a big changer in my opinion.”

    Very big change… a short pass and you are in shooting range already. Nowdays if there’s 2-3 seconds on the clock u need to pass some court and then look for the shot or shoot from 8-9 meters. This will allow teams to take decent shots in more cases when there’s few seconds on the clock. If there’s one sec on the clock, it’s a HUGE change. Also, you can forget about great last seconds plays like the Alley-Hoop of Joventut (with Rudy) that would be MUCH more difficult to run when the ball is thrown-in form there.

    ReplyCancel
  5. Eric
    17 years ago

    Just a quick thing, the 14-second reset rule applies in situations where there would have been a reset of the shot clock (such as a kicked ball, for example). On simple out-of-bounds plays, there’s no reset. The idea is to prevent teams from milking the clock by deliberately throwing the ball at the defenders’ feet, or so it seems to me.

    I might have more feedback on this later, but I just wanted to make sure you know that this 14-second reset does not happen on every inbounds play in the frontcourt. As far as I know. I mean, why else would FIBA say “if required by the respective rules”?

    ReplyCancel
  6. Eric
    17 years ago

    Oh, and the difference between a “violation” and “basket interference” is that a violation results in a turnover, while basket interference by a defender means that they count the basket. My assumption is that they didn’t count the basket if a defender reached in through the hoop and touched the ball. Then again, I’m not certain.

    ReplyCancel
  7. Daniel D. Villapando
    16 years ago

    Its nice to know the new changes because it is very helpful to especially were taking clinic in basketball new rules implemented by FIBA.

    ReplyCancel
Pingbacks: 3
  1. Olympic » Blog Archive » The rules are changing
    17 years ago
  2. 2009: finally the true world club champion will be crowned : Ball in Europe - Basketball Blog
    17 years ago
  3. The new FIBA rules already in 2008/2009 : Ball in Europe - Basketball Blog
    17 years ago

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

ballineurope
17 years ago 10 Comments More
Recent Posts
Will Cummings delivered a gritty performance as Galatasaray stunned Tenerife to reach the BCL final & reclaim relevance on the European stage
Will Cummings Leads Galatasaray’s BCL Surge
10 hours ago
NBA Semifinals 2025 Betting Guide for Series Outcome Wagers
NBA Semifinals 2025 Betting Guide for Series Outcome Wagers
15 hours ago
Kostas Papanikolaou plays a smaller on-court role these days, but his leadership remains vital to Olympiacos’ pursuit of a Euroleague title.
Kostas Papanikolaou’s Quiet Fire Powers Olympiacos
6 days ago
Categories
Recent Posts
Will Cummings Leads Galatasaray’s BCL Surge
NBA Semifinals 2025 Betting Guide for Series Outcome Wagers
Kostas Papanikolaou’s Quiet Fire Powers Olympiacos
Tags
EuroLeagueNBAYouTubeReal MadridCSKA MoscowFC BarcelonaFIBAOlympiacosPanathinaikosZalgiris KaunasACBSpainMaccabi Tel AvivRicky RubioTeam SpainLos Angeles LakersMontepaschi SienaPartizan BelgradeLithuaniaIrelandGermanyPau GasolItalyTeam LithuaniaTurkeyTeam FranceCaja Laboral BaskoniaLietuvos RytasFenerbahce ÜlkerGreeceJuan Carlos NavarroSerbiaSan Antonio SpursTony ParkerMinnesota TimberwolvesFranceDirk Nowitzkibasketball highlightsTeam RussiaALBA BerlinEuroCupEuroleagueDallas MavericksTeam USAEuroBasket 2011
Share
0
Facebook
ABOUT
BallinEurope.com was founded in September 2007 by Christophe Ney (who now runs the excellent scouting-themed website European Prospects) and Tobias Seitz, both then bloggers for FIBA.com with over 10 years’ worth of experience in the professional basketball world each. The mission then was to “provide a very unique perspective of Basketball in and about Europe.”
Most Commented
Why Andrei Kirilenko and CSKA Moscow must win the Euroleague
13 years ago
180 Comments
Euroleague Transfers Table 2008/2009
17 years ago
168 Comments
A week in highlights: Spanish block party, mighty Milos, Utah rap and some dude dunking in L.A.
14 years ago
139 Comments
Archives
Get In Touch

Email: emmetryan@gmail.com

Name: Emmet Ryan

2014 © BallinEurope. Join JCI Dublin